BalabakMan Now • 100%
I updated it to the latest version
BalabakMan Now • 100%
Does making Chinese culture sources more accessible provocative?
So, I was interested in this particular boardgame called Xiangqi. It's a Chinese version of Chess. But it's hard to search sources for this game in English. It's hard for non-chinese to knows more about Chinese culture because the lack of English sources.
BalabakMan Now • 100%
Ah okay
BalabakMan Now • 100%
I try updating the app but it says app not installed. Do I need to uninstall the previous version?
BalabakMan Now • 33%
They can get naked after people stop getting horny.
BalabakMan Now • 100%
I don't mind countercultural but TikTok right now is controlled by US. China only have power over chinese version of TikTok which is Douyin.
BalabakMan Now • 100%
I'm sorry for I'm not the one who wrote this.I just copied it from reddit. Here is the original. https://www.reddit.com/r/GenZhou/comments/tq0bop/your_thoughts_on_this/
BalabakMan Now • 100%
Idk the Jesus I read hates the rich.
BalabakMan Now • 94%
China isn't even close to phasing out markets and private property, their priorities are very much still centred on growing the economy and becoming a prosperous modern country. Leveraging markets and private capital has always been (since Deng anyway) part of their strategy on achieving this. And considering China's track record over the past few decades, I'm inclined to believe that their strategy is sound.
Unfortunately, the belief that markets=capitalism is very common. The truth is markets are actually good for most of the reasons parroted by capitalists. This isn't theory anymore, it's been demonstrated over and over again throughout the past few centuries now. China's rise being a recent and very relevant example. However, China having markets and using them to accelerate economic growth does not make China capitalist.
There's this habit in leftist spaces to hyper-focus on who owns the means of production. To judge a state's progress towards socialism only through the pace at which the ownership of the means of productions are transferred to the workers. To dismiss the USSR, China, Vietnam etc... as invalid communist projects because they didn't manage to reach the step beyond "state capitalism", because their attempts at building socialism are/were stained by the use of markets. I think this habit, this tendency, is bad and stupid.
China has not yet reached true socialism or communism, but it is still a communist country. It's a communist country because the ruling authority in China is a communist organization that is representative of the people. The CPC is a dictatorship of the proletariat, or specifically in China's case, a dictatorship of the people. Under a DotP, China's progress and development can only lead to real socialism and eventually real communism. They will make mistakes, take wrong turns and detours, but as long as political power remains in the hands of the people socialism is inevitable. And that's the part that bugs me the most about the analysis you posted. It seems like OP believes that the CPC is being false with their communist rhetoric, but to believe that means ignoring or dismissing all of the work and effort that the CPC is doing to actively resist capitalist influences and safeguard China's DotP. And I'm not okay with that.
TLDR; China is communist. Using markets doesn't make China Capitalist. If the CPC wants to go capitalist all they have to do is stop resisting capitalist influences and stop supressing their bourgeoisie.
Source: https://www.reddit.com/r/GenZhou/comments/tq0bop/your_thoughts_on_this/i2eqotr/
Is gini coefficient the best measurement for wealth distribution or is there other measurement that is better?What is the best way to measure citizens quality of life?
BalabakMan Now • 100%
If upvote count be displayed, then add downvote count too.
BalabakMan Now • 100%
Other than communist song,I only listen to Mongolian throat singing.
BalabakMan Now • 100%
Try jerboa instead
LBRY is a blockchain-based file-sharing and payment network that powers decentralized platforms, primarily social networks and video platforms. LBRY's creators also run Odysee, a video-sharing website that uses the network. Video platforms built on LBRY, such as Odysee, have been described as decentralized alternatives to YouTube. The company has described Odysee and other platforms it has built utilizing its LBRY protocol as platforms for free speech and lightly moderates content, including removing pornography or the promotion of violence and terrorism.
Aside from donating, how do I help the developer?
BalabakMan Now • 100%
I want to point out that what politicians says differs from what they actually do. Look at Trump, he makes many good points against American failure but all of his actions makes the situation even worse.
Anyone can share this site to r/sino? That place might be banned just like r/russia for "misinformation".
BalabakMan Now • 100%
As there any way to watch this on Odysee? Youtube can delete this anytime they want to. At least in odysee you can recover deleted videos on lbry.