SignullGone Now • 100%
2024 looking to be an interesting year, especially if these alleged whistleblowers come forward.
SignullGone Now • 83%
Longer interview here.
It's interesting that David Grusch admits that he does have first hand knowledge and will be revealing more in a few weeks.
SignullGone Now • 100%
Great to see more main stream coverage. The more people who see this and speak to their elected representatives, the better for disclosure.
SignullGone Now • 100%
That's great news. I'd like to know his source. I'll give it a listen. You should post it in the community!
SignullGone Now • 100%
Very much so.
SignullGone Now • 100%
Any forward progress is progress nonetheless. I agree with your frustration, however, I believe that regardless of this amendment, we have already reached the tipping point. Too much has come out and too many within the govt are aware.
SignullGone Now • 100%
Rep. Mike Turner (R-Ohio)
Rep. Mike Rogers (R-Alabama)
Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Kentucky)
Speaker of the House Mike Johnson (R-Louisiana)
SignullGone Now • 100%
Glad to hear other countries taking the "Disclosure Ball" and rolling with it. Thanks for sharing!
SignullGone Now • 100%
It seems to me that things are picking up speed. I believe much of the disclosure timeline, if there is one, will hinge on the UAP Amendment remaining intact.
SignullGone Now • 100%
All of the hypothetical points would point to them wanting to control the narrative, in my opinion.
SignullGone Now • 100%
It's getting increasingly harder to ignore, in my opinion.
SignullGone Now • 100%
If anything, they could be transparent and put some trust back in the government.
SignullGone Now • 100%
I'm assuming catastrophic leak would mean the US government doesn't get to control the narrative. I'm not sure how the leak would be catastrophic for the average citizen.
SignullGone Now • 77%
I haven't had a chance to watch/listen yet. I'll come back and edit my comment with my thoughts after. I'm hoping it's a good episode!
SignullGone Now • 100%
No problem!
SignullGone Now • 100%
Quite frustrating. I'm hoping it's something minor and not another roadblock.
>CONFIRMED- A classified briefing on UFO / UAPs scheduled for tomorrow from the intel community to lawmakers has been POSTPONED. > >The briefing was meant to address some of David Grusch’s claims to congress under oath. No more votes for the rest of the week, so many lawmakers are flying back home tonight. *** Edit: [Ask a Pol](https://twitter.com/ask_a_pol/status/1724888022418690202) >NEW: Hearing the UAP Caucus is looking to reschedule their second Grusch SCIF briefing on Dec. 7th. > >Fluid. More updates to come…
SignullGone Now • 100%
Yeah, I'm not sure why else they would bring him in, if not to capitalize on UAP coverage.
SignullGone Now • 100%
Follow up tweet.
In his new role, effective immediately, he will contribute to special projects and short and long-form documentary-style pieces on a wide range of topics, including national defense and military operations. #NewsNation
Interesting pickup from NewsNation. It seems they might double down and increase focus around the UAP topic.
SignullGone Now • 100%
Talks in this include Americans for Safe Aerospace, Ryan's thoughts on the Schumer Amendment, and the next steps Congress needs to take to validate the claims by David Grusch, under oath.
www.youtube.com
Congressman Tim Burchett (TN-02) sits down with Ryan Graves, the first active-duty pilot to come forward to Congress about UAPs. Graves founded Americans for Safe Aerospace and hosts the popular "Merged" podcast.
SignullGone Now • 100%
As of November 11th, this is his latest tweet in reference to this post.
I want you all to know that your outpouring of support means the world to me. I am fighting back HARD as I type this. As soon as I’m able I’ll share more details.
>Dr. Sean Kirkpatrick, head of the U.S. Government's UAP office, recently made the following comment about David Grusch’s claims regarding recovered ET tech: > >"We are investigating each and every one of [Grusch’s claims & leads]. ... There are some bits of information that are turning out to be things and events that really happened." Transcript [here](https://www.defense.gov/News/Transcripts/Transcript/Article/3575588/aaro-director-dr-sean-kirkpatrick-holds-an-off-camera-media-roundtable/). Additional Tweet by Christopher Mellon. >As I’ve said before, David Grusch is genuine and sincere. Moreover, I’ve heard the same claim from a number of other serious and well-placed officials. I’m confident that Congress will find more reasons to take these profound claims seriously as they continue their investigation.
>Wow! GO GO UFO! 🛸 An amendment passed today to get David Grusch into a SCIF with those he testified to in Congress (under oath) at the public UFO hearing... to spill the beans of the details he couldn't reveal in the open hearing. We're talking UFO programs and names, UFO holding locations, list of "hostile" and "non-hostile" witnesses... and about the non-human "biologics" (bodies). > >It's a meeting that's been blocked - but now it looks like it's gonna happen. it will undoubtedly lead to some subpoenas - which I think is good - for those who need that extra layer of protection to spill the beans and come clean about America's UFO exploitation and reverse engineering programs. I have some individuals in mind 😉 @RepEricBurlison > >GO GO UFO!!!
>I wanted to share a a rather devastating career issue I’ve been dealing with for the last eight months. I can’t go into too much detail at this moment, but more will come soon. Your support means the world to me. There is an attached video to this tweet.
>I’m informed by AARO that they are making headway on a new, more transparent and appropriate UAP classification guide. Hopefully in the future DoD and the IC will be able to release more data and videos as @CBP recently did.
The Department of Defense Office of Inspector General is not responsible for determining the classification of the information in our oversight work, nor do we determine the level of security clearances for congressional leaders. The DoD OIG is committed to being as transparent and communicative as possible with our congressional leaders, and welcome any further opportunity to discuss our body of work.