Reuters

Did you read the article before commenting or are you just commenting on the title?

You relaize that the same could be said about Signal?

Link for what?

How so...

Media Bias/ Fact check:

Bias Rating: LEAST BIASED

Factual Reporting: HIGH

Country: USA

Press Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE

Media Type: Radio Station

Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic

MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY

AllSides Bias Rating: Center.

AdFontes:

Bias: Middle

Reliability: Reliable, Analysis/Fact Reporting

Probably a bot, a troll or both. /s

Just to put the whole quotation:

Telegram, particularly influential in Russia, Ukraine and the republics of the former Soviet Union, is ranked as one of the major social media platforms after Facebook, YouTube, WhatsApp, Instagram, TikTok and WeChat. It aims to hit 1 billion users in the next year.

In my opinion they said it in this way instead of listing every country that this app is common in.

Why?

A lot of pirated content is distributed using telegram.

Sue them for what exactly?

The article mention that he is detained as part of a investigation:

Durov was traveling aboard his private jet, TF1 said on its website, adding he had been targeted by an arrest warrant in France as part of a preliminary police investigation.

TF1 and BFM both said the investigation was focused on a lack of moderators on Telegram, and that police considered that this situation allowed criminal activity to go on undeterred on the messaging app.

Can you list them?

Currently, the reddit and lemmy community, as far as my knowledge goes, allow other microblog sites.

• Stopping illegal immigration?
• Reduce government spending?
• Lower government control that harm the competition for small companies?

Politics is not as simple as black and white.

You could support the left wing on good ideas and support the good right wing ideas when they make sense and still fight injustices.

Your example fail to account for the huge amount of issues both sides disagree about.

As I said in earlier comment you could support abortion and not support Universal Basic Income, which is supposed to land you in centrist postion, not a dog kicker.

You could simply vote for the good party that align with what make sense for you.

So, all of that does not make a person evil.

As for right wing( Dog kickers in your context) people who lie, I had never met or saw them, so I can't have an opinion about it.

You are not arguing against my comment or supporting it, which make me ask the following question: what is the relvance of the info you put here to the discussion?

What are you arguing for here?

But you could take ideas from both sides.

For example: Support abortion rights but be againest Universal Basic Income.

You get my idea, you could pick and choose till you get the centrist view.

Also about news bias, it should be the default to be least biased in my opinion. The news should be boring and should just tell you what happened without telling you how you should feel about it.

Disable JavaScript.

Just a life hack for this article and other websites as welll: Disable JavaScript.