SpaceX Crew Dragon, πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈπŸ¦… America's ONLY spacecraft capable of carrying people πŸ¦…πŸ’ͺ
  • golden_retriever golden_retriever Now β€’ 50%

    Boeing's Starliner is in the same situation. Let's go with operating spacecraft then since technically any rocket can carry people if you shove them in the payload bay (loss of life may occur)

    0
  • FACT: Operating Starlink in Ukraine costs Elon $100 million [1]. FACT: The USGOV only gave SpaceX $3 million for equipment sent to Ukraine [2].
  • golden_retriever golden_retriever Now β€’ 100%

    Why is the government buying launches a bad thing? SpaceX provides a service that they want. The money would just have gone to Lockheed and Boeing otherwise

    1
  • After spending $7 million on restoring a launchpad at the Vandenberg Spaceport, USAF never actually let them use it. Instead of sitting on their hands while waiting for infinite amounts of government paperwork and delays they took charge. In just a few months a new launch site was constructed entirely from scratch in the middle of the Pacific Ocean. When you don't have a bottomless source of taxpayer money you can't afford to be slow.

    -33
    0
    SpaceX Crew Dragon, πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈπŸ¦… America's ONLY spacecraft capable of carrying people πŸ¦…πŸ’ͺ
  • golden_retriever golden_retriever Now β€’ 33%

    Saturn V was cancelled many many years ago. Falcon 9 is the only currently capable vehicle.

    -2
  • Doing what everyone (even NASA!) considered impossible
  • golden_retriever golden_retriever Now β€’ 16%

    Idk I'm just a space nerd but it seems to have worked very well for rocketry. Is there any rocket that's better than falcon or Starship?

    -4
  • Doing what everyone (even NASA!) considered impossible
  • golden_retriever golden_retriever Now β€’ 14%

    You seem to have fallen for misinformation. Eric Berger, an accredited journalist, wrote a book on the early days of SpaceX. It's called "Liftoff" and I recommend you educate yourself instead of trusting random internet strangers.

    Multiple key employees of SpaceX have repeatedly proclaimed that Musk is indeed the chief engineer and has an active role in the company. I also think it's interesting to draw parallells to other similar space startups such as Blue Origin, Armadillo Aerospace, Rocket Lab. What made SpaceX successful while they failed? It is not money because Bezos has plenty of that.

    If you want hear more about Elon and engineering I can recommend the interviews and corresponding starbase tour with "The Everyday Astronaut". There are many hours Elon talking rocketry and explaining how it works in depth.

    -10
  • Doing what everyone (even NASA!) considered impossible
  • golden_retriever golden_retriever Now β€’ 11%

    NASA chose SpaceX for their moon lander so there is still hope πŸ˜ƒ They will make a strong team πŸ’ͺ

    -13
  • Meanwhile the Russians can enjoy their shitty cramped Soyuz🀣

    -54
    9

    And soon all that power will take us to the moon once again πŸš€

    -42
    0
    some Superheros don't wear capes!
  • golden_retriever golden_retriever Now β€’ 66%

    I am NOT gsa. This is slander

    1
  • Falcon 9/Heavy is such a game changer for the space industry. Don't even get me started on Starship 😍

    -67
    9
    FUCK YOU ELON!
  • golden_retriever golden_retriever Now β€’ 14%

    Most intelligent Elon hater

    -5
  • It's insane how Elon has normalized landing an orbital booster more than once per week.

    -25
    0
    golden_retriever Now
    6 10

    golden_retriever

    lemmy.world