wulf Now • 100%
LXC is much more light weight than VMs, so it's not as much overhead. I've done it this way in case I need to reboot a container (or something goes wrong with an update) without disrupting the other services
Also keeps it consistent since I have some services that don't run in docker. One service per LXC
wulf Now • 100%
I run a different LXC on Proxmox for every service, so it's a bunch. Probably a better way to do it since most of those just run a docker container inside them.
wulf Now • 100%
Vast majority of sites work for me (librewolf), but for the few that don't I also have Vivaldi installed
wulf Now • 100%
Both of these are on f-droid
My favorite e-reader is Cool Reader(granted, it was last updated 3 years ago)
My favorite music player is innerTune (however that is more for playing YouTube vids as music)
wulf Now • 100%
Second impression of Garuda (Arch based). My first impression was the dragonized version, which is KDE with lots of mods to make it Mac like, but with extra window animations.
I like things simple, so when I tried Garuda again, I installed the Gnome version. Other than some weirdness getting my Nvidia card working with Wayland, it has run better than anything else on my laptop.
wulf Now • 100%
Fully agree with this. There will be a slight learning curve since it will be different from what your used to, but it's friendly enough to figure out.
If you know the windows program you want to use just search something like "Linux alternative for x" (sometimes there is specific KDE or Gnome progs)
wulf Now • 100%
Invidious is awesome, if possible, self hosting one in docker is great and keeps it up to date
wulf Now • 91%
Call me a socialist, but the moment the tech was proven either the US or some UN based org should have eminent domained and brought Starlink.
That way there wouldn't be multiple companies sending tens of thousands of satellites into space. And hypothetically there would be a greater expectation of equal access. Oh and access wouldn't be at the whim of a pretty billionaire.
wulf Now • 100%
Ha, I did the same thing. Was getting really tired of pip issues and attempting to use pyenv and messing up a lot. Figured I'd start clean.
Didn't realize so much depended on python and ended up needing to rebuild the whole thing.
Now I don't mess with python on my host and only use VMs for Dev or messing around.
wulf Now • 100%
This was my problem, it's enabled by default, so double check that
wulf Now • 100%
SOLUTION:
Here is the solution I came up with:
pub struct Configuration {}
impl Configuration {
fn get std::str::FromStr>() -> Result {
Ok(T::from_str("1234");
}
}
fn main() {
let my_conf_val = Configuration::get();
}
wulf Now • 100%
Afraid this might have been the case, if Ogeon's suggestion doesn't work out, I'll probably end up with multiple getters, one per type. There aren't that many anyway
Thank you!
wulf Now • 100%
Correct, I would want the caller to know what they're getting, I'll see if this works, Thank you!
Background: I have a large serde_json value that I want to be read-only (the authoritative source is an encrypted SQLite DB and should only be updated when that gets updated) The issue, I would like a single get function that returns a generic type ```rust use serde_json; pub struct Configuration { config: serde_json::Value, } impl Configuration { async fn get(&self, key: &str) -> Result { let tmp_value: = &self.config["test"]; // This would be repeated for String, bool, etc if tmp_value.is_i64() { match tmp_value.as_i64 { Some(x) => Ok(x), Err(e) => Err(()), } } else { Err(()) } } } ``` However I get: "mismatched types expected type parameter T found type i64" Is it even possible to return multiple types from a single function? EDIT: SOLUTION Here is the solution I came up with: ```rust pub struct Configuration {} impl Configuration { fn get std::str::FromStr>() -> Result { Ok(T::from_str("1234"); } } fn main() { let my_conf_val = Configuration::get(); } ```
wulf Now • 100%
Yes! It shouldn't be difficult to purchase a house, but when we were looking, none of the seller agents would even talk to us until we had a buyers agent 🙄
wulf Now • 94%
Any Ubuntu affiliated distro is required to use snaps, so Kubuntu will use them. Startup times are terrible, but running performance should be the same.
Another simple distro to try would be either Mint or Pop-OS. Both are still Ubuntu based, but without snaps
Mint's interface (Cinnamon) is similar to Windows, Pop-OS uses a modified GNome
wulf Now • 100%
I'm not sure of exactly how they manage everything, but my county library system uses Debian with an XFCE interface.
Not sure if it's because it's been this way long enough now, or it just looks close enough to Windows, but I haven't known anyone to complain (and my in-laws complain about everything else)
wulf Now • 100%
Self hoster of Invidious, I've just setup a docker instance with a Watchtower docker container running too for auto updates. No real maintenance needed.
NewPipe on Android
There are definitely times where things will stop working for a bit (due to Google shananagans) but the devs seem on top of it. So it doesn't take too long before it's working again.
wulf Now • 100%
Those Sony ones look perfect, thank you!
Do you know if the Bose are significantly better and worth waiting for a sale?
Looking to get new headphones since the battery is now shot in my Corsair I'm looking for: - Mostly listening to music, some online meetings, some single player games (I am not an audio file) - Bluetooth that can save multiple devices - Over ear - Noise cancelling (preferably adjustable, but not necessary) - Microphone (preferred but not necessary) - Under 300 (preferably under 200) Whenever I search online the lists are always "here is the best for 500 - 1000, or really affordable, but with no features" Thank you in advanced!
wulf Now • 100%
Super complete answer, thank you!
Also, that's a nice amount of interest!
wulf Now • 100%
This seems like the best answer, it's still not exact since interest changes daily (at least in the U.S) and interest compounds monthly.
But I changed the interest formula to:
Number of Days * Interest Rate * (Last Balance + Deposit) / 365
That seems to be more accurate.
So for our kids, who are still quite young, instead of opening an entire other savings account for them, we decided to do "virtual" savings accounts. Essentially, we have a spreadsheet with what money they have gotten from birthdays and other events, then we just deposit it in our savings. They can withdraw whenever they want. In this spreadsheet, I've been trying to keep track of interest (in a basic way), to show how saving can also help them "earn" money. However, I don't think I'm doing it correctly. See Google sheet: dates are not correct and interest rates are not accurate. I just wanted to show that we are attempting to give the "correct" interest rate for the given date. (I know interest rates fluctuate all the time, just trying to not make it not too difficult to maintain) https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1rwwIFVOGYt-lIx8Dtuv_6PGz28jSNQbH7LcZG2qKlfg/edit?usp=sharing Thank you for taking a look, I've been trying to get this right for a while.