Jeg antager der menes tegnsprog?

- Hun [Aki-Matilda Høgh-Dam] har grebet sagen an på en måde, hvor hun har konfliktmaksimeret noget, der ikke behøver være en konflikt, siger Anna Falkenberg.

[...]

Selv Aaja Chemnitz, der ligesom Aki-Matilda Høgh-Dam er valgt på Grønland, dog for et andet parti, Inuit Ataqatigiits, er frustreret over den måde, Aki-Matilda Høgh-Dam har håndteret sagen på.

[...]

- Problemet har været måden, det er blevet gjort på. Det har skabt modtand i præsidiet, og jeg oplever, at vi er nået op på et helt nyt konfliktniveau.

Det synes jeg siger det meget godt.

It’s on the internet. Public. Got it. It’s almost as if, and hold on to your hats here, the whole point of posting on something like Mastodon or Lemmy or so is to have a public discourse, as you cannot know who will be replying anyways. It’s almost as if, and this is getting wild, I know, read-access being public is intentional and explicitly part of the design.

This is true for Mastodon and Lemmy and I generally agree with this sentiment.

That said, ActivityPub is more than just Lemmy and Mastodon. ActivityPub is more general than that. Lemmy and Mastodon are designed in a way where public discourse is the default and everything you write is expected to be public. But ActivityPub on its own has no such assumptions. There's nothing about ActivityPub that says that you cannot build a more private social media with it. But actually you can't really, because of the problems that the blog post points out. But the vision I think for some people is that this should be possible.

I'm personally not 100% convinced that that vision is even possible though tbh.

Ja, jeg tror bare det er det 😅. Det er godt nok ikke meget af en artikel. Det er dårlig nok en tweet!

EDIT: Ser ud til den er blevet fyldt ud nu.

I love me some calzone with spaghetti bolognese inside of it. It's very indulgent but so good.

Sidste arbejdsdag før en uges ferie 🥳

Sure. But lemmy would still not show Mastodon posts outside communities even if they supported that extension. Both parties need to move towards each other.

Det er også fordi jeg først lige nu har hentet fællesskabet tror jeg :P

!brandnewsentence@lemmy.world 🤷

Er det ikke holdningen for de fleste partier?

ActivityPub is an extensible protocol. It is not just one thing. Lemmy only supports posts that follow that extension I linked above. That extension has a definition and Lemmy follows it so in that way it is "standard". But it is an extension, not part of the core protocol.

Mastodon and most other fediverse services do not support this extension.

Its not that anyone is "doing it wrong" and Mastodon doesn't really support Lemmys communities either. So Lemmy works in a bit of a funky way that doesn't match most other fediverse services.

Its just a bit strange that Lemmy does not support the more common posts outside communities since that is how most of the fediverse works, so we're kinda missing out on a lot of content that we can't see on Lemmy.

This is the FEP Lemmy uses but most other fediverse services do not use it and Lemmy does not support anything that doesn't use this FEP. So again, it's not that Lemmy is doing something wrong, but Lemmy is not supporting how most of the rest of the fediverse functions.

I think Mastodon is very far from standard

I think it's much closer to standard than Lemmy and I've looked into it quite a bit recently. ActivityPub is unfortunately quite focused on microblogging. Honestly lemmys way of doing it is a little hacky.

As for the posts outside communities? That makes sense lemmy-wise I think. Where would those posts be?

I actually think it's quite straightforward, they'd just be on a users page. This is actually how Reddit has also done it ever since they introduced the feature (much before they enshittified everything else).

You can think of it like every users profile being a community of its own but only the user itself can post to it. Just conceptually speaking.

That would also let you follow users just as you can follow communities.

I mean you could equally ask why does Lemmy not support posts outside communities? It's on both parties to interoperate I think. Lemmy also uses a specific extension to ActivityPub while Discourse's posts and Mastodon's posts and such are pretty standard, but still not picked up by Lemmy.

It has ActivityPub support so it is connected to the fediverse in some ways. Lemmy doesn't work with it though AFAIK because Lemmy doesn't support posts made outside communities.

If there was a Reddit/Lemmy style website (where people create communities for various subjects but it’s all available from the same website using the same credentials) with forum style discussions

Isn't this just Discourse?

Ved Enhedslistens årsmøde tidligere i år stillede 22 medlemmer af partiet, herunder fire medlemmer af hovedbestyrelsen, et forslag om at genoptage støtten til DFLP. Det blev ikke vedtaget.

Det er altså 4 ud af de 25 medlemmer i hovedbestyrelsen der blandt andre stillede dette forslag. Det er 16% af hovedbestyrelsen, lige under 1/6 (16.6...%). Dvs at hvis man skulle udelukke nogen så ville det kræve at alle de andre 21 medlemmer stemte for det (hvis man antager at de resterende 4 ville stemme imod).

Jeg har ikke noget problem med privat praksis, men de bør aflønnes med samme takst som i det offentlige og uden brugerbetaling

Jeg kan igen godt se motivationen, men tager man ikke noget frihed væk fra folk når de ikke har mulighed for at finansiere (via brugerbetaling) en lægepraksis/skole som de vil have den? Men det er måske ikke en frihed der betyder så meget? Det er jo kun dem der er ressourcestærke (og dermed allerede har meget frihed på anden vis) der har mulighed for at give den finansiering.

ønsker at begrænse speciallægers mulighed for at behandle privatbetalende patienter

Altså simpelthen gøre det ulovligt? Eller hvad er det konkrete forslag? Jeg synes motivationen er god.

Vil de der har råd ikke bare tage til udlandet for at få behandling? Men det er måske også okay?

Well there is a phenomenon where your brain will make sound and sight "match up" even when it shouldn't. Like if you hear and see a basketball bouncing 75 meters away, the sound should have about a 0.25 second delay. But your brain will make you perceive the sound as happening simultaneously with the ball hitting the ground, despite the fact that you could not perceive the visual and auditory sensations simultaneously. If you go further away with the ball, eventually there is a threshold where your start perceiving the delay. The auditory and visual sense would need to be somehow linked for this phenomenon to happen I'd say.

I guess it's the brains way of matching visual and auditory cues to try to make a better picture of the world. The brain is basically saying "that sound came from the ball" and you don't even need to think consciously to know that.