ppptan Now • 100%
Right. With federation, it's only an addition to the network, not supplanting it.
ppptan Now • 100%
I wish there was a turnkey solution for this
ppptan Now • 100%
More for other users reading this than you.
ppptan Now • 100%
It'd be nice if there were some way to link accounts across different instances
ppptan Now • 75%
That'll only be the case if third party apps for kbin/lemmy are good enough and have the kinks ironed out within the next two weeks.
ppptan Now • 100%
This one seems a bit less silly of an electric plane idea: https://www.vox.com/recode/2023/2/2/23582152/nasa-x-plane-boeing-air-force-sustainable-aircraft
Apparently the engines use regular fuel for takeoff but use battery for the rest of the flight.
ppptan Now • 100%
That makes sense
ppptan Now • 100%
I did read them, and I agreed with them just fine, but I still got rejected. It just doesn't feel necessary to affirm a philosophy when my aim is to just participate in a nice place.
I don't want a 1-1 reddit replacement. I want something better, which is why I'm trying to replace reddit in the first place.
ppptan Now • 100%
I came to Beehaw from Reddit as well during the most recent wave, and I didn't come here really expecting Beehaw to replace Reddit for anything more than the content format.
Same for me, but my application was still rejected. I wanted something better, but that doesn't change the fact that it would replace reddit for me.
ppptan Now • 100%
they're welcome to interact with our instance obviously as long as they abide by the rules
What about the people abiding by the rules who thought lemmy.world or sh.itjust.works would be fine enough instances to sign up with? Feels like throwing out plenty of babies with the bathwater, even if the bathwater was particularly dirty.
ppptan Now • 100%
I suppose that that confusion was why my application wasn't accepted. I wanted something better, but that doesn't change the fact that it would replace reddit for me. I think I would fit in just fine, agree with the philosophy, and help foster the community you're trying to build, but trying to be a true believer in any philosophy wouldn't be my primary motivator. I adapt to where I am.
ppptan Now • 100%
Lemmy is harder to start than reddit because the federated nature of it makes it not just one place. Just because you want to escape the man doesn't mean you want to have to jump through hoops and read a textbook of documentation to understand things.
ppptan Now • 100%
How does that square with beehaw gaining significant numbers of users as part of reddit's recent migration? They wouldn't be looking for somewhere to join if they felt like reddit would continue to work for them, and I'd say that automatically makes replacing reddit their primary goal.
ppptan Now • 100%
It's not about getting told what to do or having your data sold, it's about a friction-free social media experience. It depends on what the aims of the platform are and what the desires of potential users are. Personally, I'd imagine most users want something simple and easy, where they don't have to think about what and where and how to post. But if the intent of the platform is to make that harder, then that's fine, it'll just result in fewer users and less content/activity.
ppptan Now • 100%
@LambentMote
I thought I engaged pretty well with the questions, but I answered them from a simple, matter-of-fact perspective, basically just saying that it's a big instance and I'd like to be a part of it, then answering #3 with the communities I'd like to participate in. Do I have to specifically affirm the philosophical underpinnings of how beehaw operates? I'm fine with that and I do agree with them with how I would participate on beehaw, it just didn't seem necessary when applying.
ppptan Now • 100%
I thought I engaged pretty well with the questions, but I answered them from a simple, matter-of-fact perspective, basically just saying that it's a big instance and I'd like to be a part of it, then answering #3 with the communities I'd like to participate in. Do I have to specifically affirm the philosophical underpinnings of how beehaw operates? I'm fine with that and I do agree with them with how I would participate on beehaw, it just didn't seem necessary when applying.
ppptan Now • 100%
For beehaw registration. I'm accessing it from kbin, but especially in light of defederating from two of the biggest open-registration lemmy instances, I'd like to be on beehaw directly.
ppptan Now • 100%
I'm not really sure how you can distinguish between one open-registration instance and another, since spammers and trolls can just sign up to any open-registration site and interact with beehaw like I'm doing now.
Is reapplying a thing? How do I know if I should reapply?
I'm guessing it has something to do with mastodon, since microblogging is interoperable with mastodon like how threads are interoperable with lemmy. Example post: [https://kbin.social/m/technology@beehaw.org/p/434431](https://kbin.social/m/technology@beehaw.org/p/434431) I can see this post on beehaw here: [https://beehaw.org/post/565892](https://beehaw.org/post/565892) But next to it in technology@beehaw.org are threads that show up in the threads section of kbin.social/m/technology@beehaw.org How are threads and microblogs distinguished on different instances if they're both interoperable with both lemmy and mastodon like this appears to be? How can you access the general mastodon feed from kbin?
Apparently there's some sort of fix in the pipeline related to this, but at the very least, I'd like to be able to type kbin.social/m/kbinmeta and be redirected to kbin.social/m/kbinMeta