Stimmt, hab ich ganz vergessen.

Das heißt aber, die Person hat auch 100 UFO-Dokus gesehen, die kamen ja genauso oft. Manchmal mit Bonus Hitler-Überlappungen.

Wer schaut sich denn freiwillig 100 Hitler Dokus an?

It's okay, I've added a small arrow just for you

That's for the second one though, for the [verb] [noun] combination. The "[adjective]" [noun] combination implies spacefaring or similar, doesn't it?

I'm sure he isn't pro-zionist

What hormones would a gym fembroy take though?

It's not describing the noun, it's part of the noun.

Quick analogy in German:

space billionaire = Weltraummilliärdär

spacefaring billionaire = weltraumreisender Milliärdär

In German, adjective + noun cannot be written together to form a new noun. To form one, only noun + noun can be used. And English is close enough to Germanic languages for that rule to remain the same, I think.

How is space an adjective in the first one? Shouldn't it be a noun?

These Anglo-Saxons again, putting random spaces into compound words.

Have you read this article yet (warning: long and sad)? The AI used was the private GPT-3 Beta in mid-2021, almost 1.5 years before ChatGPT was launched.

https://www.sfchronicle.com/projects/2021/jessica-simulation-artificial-intelligence/

But Chemie comes from Chemnitz (obviously) so it must be pronounced with K

Don't know where China comes from, maybe from Chinese which is obviously pronounced with K.

It's obviously pronounced Kicago, just like Chamäleon, Chemie and China :)

Yeah, safety == security in German.

Why the fuck do you even need to write an essay to get into college in the US

That's good and all...

But how do you pronounce Wokot?

Is it wuh-ko?
Maybe Woke-o?

I MUST KNOW

Suppose the man is blind then. He has the ability to jump but is unaware of the trolley hurliing towards the people on the track. While he has the ability to act his only "crime" is being unaware. Isn't this equivalent to the original trolley problem?

[I]t may rather be supposed that he is the driver of a runaway tram, which he can only steer from one narrow track on to another; five men are working on one track and one man on the other.

In this case, all six men are unaware of the runaway trolley heading towards them, believing themselves to be safe. The one working on his own track has not made up his mind yet as to whether he would want himself to be sacrificed. You would impose your own will onto him, wouldn't you?

I don't have any solution for variations of the trolley problem that satisfy me. I would likely act based upon what I felt was right at the time without considering (all) the implications. Without the threat of running out of time however, I believe it's much more difficult to decide how to act.

Nuuuu that's not simple >:(

All adult games on Steam are banned already in Germany + those on The Index.

But would you push the fat man over the railing?

As before, a trolley is hurtling down a track towards five people. You are on a bridge under which it will pass, and you can stop it by putting something very heavy in front of it. As it happens, there is a fat man next to you – your only way to stop the trolley is to push him over the bridge and onto the track, killing him to save five. Should you proceed?

• Some random philosopher

But...

To be fair, there's a very simple solution for that... 🔒