dx1 Now • 50%
I think the total number killed by Hamas rockets EVER is like 30 to 50. Might be a little off. It's more about draining Israel's money and putting up a show than anything else.
dx1 Now • 66%
Hamas killed 1200 with about 500 to 600 civilian deaths
Minus a few hundred Israel killed with "friendly fire".
dx1 Now • 50%
Of course it's feasible. Biden literally cannot win, it's in fact the only option if you don't want to see GOP in power again.
dx1 Now • 50%
Prohibition? We still have drug prohibition. Woman's suffrage? It's something, but women's votes still are as useless as everyone else's, especially if you refuse to vote for anything to actually change (and they still have a wage gap). 75-day school year - what? Jim Crow? Improvements but black communities institutionalized, ghettoized, gunned down by cops, and still a wage gap. See prohibition.
Plus, now our government is totalitarian, eating a third of GDP, massive surveillance state, largest military on earth, quarter of the prisoner's on Earth, constantly trying to censor the internet, economy is insanely unequal and getting worse, inflation over the long term getting worse and wages not keeping up with them, housing prices skyrocketing, and currently openly engaged in a genocide despite nation-wide protests. Need me to keep going?
dx1 Now • 33%
Wow, sorry, didn't realize this was still going.
What is my feasible solution? General strike and/or total shift to third party to implement direct democracy. 100 million people can go out and waste their vote on a petty tyrant like Biden or Trump, or 100 million people can actually start making real changes. You're all in a prison of your own making.
dx1 Now • 80%
That's not what he said...
dx1 Now • 14%
Good luck with your attempts at incremental change, that've been going on for a century while our society has completely devolved into fascism, a bipartisan police state and a genocidal global empire. You are clearly the brilliant visionary we need to guide us into the uncharted future.
dx1 Now • 100%
Including Montana.
dx1 Now • 14%
"Our democracy" has been dead for a century. You guys are like rats running around a maze with your moronic "lesser of two evils" between two parties all controlled by the same interests.
dx1 Now • 22%
Both parties openly backing and arming the genocide in Palestine, the most well-documented genocide in world history, despite overwhelming public opposition, is not a binary system, it's a one-party system. We are living in dystopia already, the Democrats shave 3% off of whatever the fascist Republican platform is and say "we're the best option." Stop being a fool and see the system for what it is.
dx1 Now • 100%
Literally 2 minutes after you posted, they did.
dx1 Now • 66%
Not voting or voting for a third party is not a vote for Republicans, it's not voting or voting for a third party.
You should be ashamed to vote for any of the major two parties giving their full backing to an ongoing genocide. The myth of Democrats and Republicans as meaningfully separate parties is dead.
(edit) And to be absolutely clear what I mean here. Their economic policy, the towering administrative state, the military funding, the Federal Reserve, the bailout policy, the surveillance state, the DHS, TSA, ATF, CIA, FBI, all the international imperial meddling, empire building, regime change & overthrowing democratic leaders shit, it's all the same goddamn thing between both parties. They literally only bicker about small fry social issues and hope the gullible people in the public who haven't studied anything won't notice the bipartisan consensus on everything else. It's honestly embarrassing how much people sit around and defend Democrats, you have no idea what 95% of what they actually uphold even is. We were all screaming 2000-2008 about Bush cementing a police state into power, and then Obama came along and literally normalized the entire thing, and now it's like that's all forgotten history.
dx1 Now • 60%
I see unequivocal fascism from both parties. I reject the idiotic "lesser of two evils" thinking.
dx1 Now • 100%
That is the risk with taxes. You can't stop paying them, so politicians, in some circumstances, are able to use them for things you don't want.
dx1 Now • 52%
IDK what the fuck you guys have been watching for the last two months. I've been watching a genocide unfold with unaninmous bipartisan support. If you can see that and don't think both parties are beyond redemption, you're part of the problem.
I'm assuming we're talking about the actual parties/politicians here, not the people.
dx1 Now • 40%
This is annoying.
dx1 Now • 50%
How many beheadings have there been, versus the number of Muslim people who have ever lived?
dx1 Now • 100%
In effect, the bonds I mentioned are just inverted loans. The Treasury takes in $1k from payroll taxes for these programs, issues a bond to the trust fund saying "I owe you $1k plus interest", spends the $1k on whatever (I guess primarily the discretionary budget) and eventually has to somehow generate money to pay it back with interest.
In terms of whether or not bonds were "borrowed" - this wouldn't exactly matter in a meaningful sense, but I'm not clear this ever actually happened in the first place. There was some claim about, when the trust fund was mixed with the general fund 1968-1990, maybe the government took bonds out of the program, but you have to remember that inside the government, that's not something of value, that's just an obligation the government has to pay to itself, it's a big nothing burger. The outstanding liabilities from Social Security to the actual beneficiaries (elderly people) exist regardless of how the government is doing their accounting internally.
dx1 Now • 83%
Read any SS Trustees report. It doesn't have "money", it has debt instruments (bonds), which are essentially a document saying "we the government owe ourselves a thousand dollars". You can print those all day, it's only sourcing that money that has any kind of direct consequence (taxation, inflation, etc.).
And yes, that does raise an interesting question of, what did they do with the actual money we paid into the programs, if the only thing in the trust fund is bonds.